ISSN 1694-8882 / e-ISSN 1694-8890
Vol. 17, No. 4, 2025 / Pages 186-198

Errors in the interpretation of x-ray images

Received 20.08.2025
Revised 02.12.2025
Accepted 25.12.2025

Abstract

X-ray examinations remain one of the most common and accessible methods of visual diagnosis, widely used in clinical practice. The quality of X-ray interpretation directly affects the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of subsequent stages of treatment, but for medical students, this process is often quite difficult. In this regard, it is necessary to study the causes of errors in the interpretation of X-ray images at the stage of professional training. The study aimed to identify the main causes of errors in the interpretation of X-ray images and the characteristics associated with the training profile of students. The study involved 164 medical university students studying paediatrics (n = 62), general medicine (n = 88) and preventive medicine (n = 14). Data were collected through an anonymous online questionnaire that included closed and open-ended questions aimed at assessing the difficulties of interpreting radiographic images, the level of confidence and the amount of practical experience. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, χ² and Pearson’s correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. The study determined that the most common errors were missing pathological changes, incorrect localisation of foci and misinterpretation of artefacts. The greatest difficulties were caused by chest X-rays, lateral projections, and images of the musculoskeletal system. The average level of confidence of students in interpreting X-rays was low, at 4.1 ± 1.7 points. Medical students demonstrated a higher level of confidence and a lower error rate compared to students from other disciplines. A moderate negative correlation was found between the level of confidence and the number of errors made. The results obtained indicate the need to expand the scope of practice-oriented training, introduce a systematic approach to the interpretation of X-ray images, and use modern digital educational tools to improve the quality of training for future doctors 

Keywords

radiology; image interpretation; diagnostic errors; students; medical education

Suggested citation

APA Style
Chernomortseva, E., Borodulin, W., Borodulin, R. & Chernomortsev, S. (2025). Errors in the interpretation of x-ray images. Eurasian Health Journal, 17(4), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2025-4-186
Copied!
Vancouver Style
Chernomortseva, E., Borodulin, W., Borodulin, R., Chernomortsev, S.. Errors in the interpretation of x-ray images. Eurasian Health J. 2025;17(4):186-98. https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2025-4-186
Copied!

References

  1. Preobrazhenskaya EV, Kislova AV, Kharitonov NA. Detection of errors in a three-dimensional model of a dual-focus X-ray tube cathode using 3D scanning. In: Advanced materials and technologies (AMT-2024): Proceedings of the international scientific and technical conference. Moscow: MIREA – Russian Technological University; 2024. 257–62.
  2. Grabar DM, Ivanov YuS. Study of methods and algorithms for image pattern recognition. Sci Notes Komsomol Amur State Technol Univ. 2023;7(71):20–7. DOI: 10.17084/20764359-2023-71-20
  3. Marchenko OV. Time series analysis using neural networks. Sci Notes Komsomol Amur State Technol Univ. 2022;7(63):77–85. DOI: 10.17084/20764359-2022-63-77
  4. Konakov AS, Tislenko VI, Shavrin VV. A-priori error of the initial conditions while solving the problem of space vehicle navigation using pulsar signals. J Sib Fed Univ Math Phys. 2016;9(3):310–9.
  5. Stelmashchuk SV. Assessment of the quality of an automatic control system based on a simplified model. Sci Notes Komsomol Amur State Technol Univ. 2010;1(1):36–9.
  6. Khasanshin SD, Grigorieva AL. Mathematical modeling of chest X-ray image recognition using deep learning. In: Youth and science: Current problems of fundamental and applied research. Komsomolsk-on-Amur: Komsomolsk-on-Amur State University; 2025. 592–6.
  7. National Institutes of Health. NIH Chest X-Ray Dataset [Internet]. [cited 2025 November 21]. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/nih-chest-xrays/data
  8. Zhbanov VA, Abarnikova EB. Design and development of a neural network model for determining similarity of two unstructured data samples. Sci Notes Komsomol Amur State Technol Univ. 2023;1(65):47–53. DOI: 10.17084/20764359-2023-65-47
  9. Yakovleva EA, Borodulin VP, Borodulin RP. Comparative assessment of nutrition organization among students of different faculties. Probl Sch Univ Med Health. 2025;(4):20–6.
  10. Podgalo DD. Medical errors associated with incorrect interpretation of X-ray images. In: Youth in science: New arguments. Lipetsk: Argument; 2018. 177–82.
  11. Alekseeva NT, Karandeeva AM, Kvaratskhelia AG. Use of X-ray anatomy laboratory materials in practical classes. In: Proceedings dedicated to the 115th anniversary of M.G. Prives. Voronezh: Nauchnaya Kniga; 2019. 9–12.
  12. Kislyakov VV, Krasnova TS, Leonov SS, Fomin VA. Application of a digital training complex for X-ray research in technological education. Top Issues Account Manag Inf Econ. 2024;(6):567–71.
  13. Borisova NA, Shelukhina AN, Dorofeeva SG. Awareness of medical students about chronic coronary syndrome. In: Propedeutics of internal diseases: Proceedings. Kursk: Kursk State Medical University; 2024. 36–40.
  14. Borodulin VP, Borodulin RP. The image of a modern physician in the media space. In: Bioethics and global challenges of medicine in the 21st century: Proceedings of the international conference. Kursk: Kursk State Medical University; 2023. 13–6.
  15. Samedov VV. Fluctuations of induced charge caused by fluctuations of the X-ray quantum absorption point in a semiconductor detector. Nucl Phys Eng. 2023;14(3):248–57. DOI: 10.56304/S2079562922050426
  16. Strok TA, Gubar LM. X-ray computed tomography: possible errors in interpretation. In: Modern issues of radiation medicine. Grodno; 2021. 225–8.
  17. Avrunin AS, Tikhilov RM, Shubnyakov II, Ganeva DG, Pliev VV, Popov ID, et al. Reproducibility error of dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry in studying the periprosthetic zone around the femoral component Spotorno. Travmatol Ortop Russ. 2009;2(52):89–95.
  18. Sizov AA, Tarasov YuA, Borodulin VP, Borodulin RP. Fundamentals of effective discussion in intercultural space. Intercult Commun Educ Med. 2025;4(21):12–20.
  19. Rumyantsev AA, Bikmuratov FM, Pashin NP. Entropy estimation of lung X-ray image fragments. Cybern Program. 2021;(1):20–6. DOI: 10.25136/2644-5522.2021.1.31676
  20. Hegazi T, Kurdi K, Alfayez A, Alhammad A, Aldakheel A, Alshahrani R, et al. Clinical-year students’ competency in chest X-ray interpretation: A theoretical-based intervention. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2025;13(2):133–41. DOI: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_623_24
  21. Kok EM, Jarodzka H, de Bruin AB, BinAmir HA, Robben SG, van Merriënboer JJ. Systematic viewing in radiology: Seeing more, missing less? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(1):189–205. DOI: 10.1007/s10459015-9624-y
  22. Truten VP, Lubasheva OYa. Dependence of diagnostic quality on compliance with standard dental X-ray positioning. Endodont Today. 2020;18(2):16–21. DOI: 10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-16-21
  23. Chernomortseva ES, Chueva TV, Borodulin VP, Borodulin RP, Chernomortsev SE. Analysis of the effectiveness of self-study methods among medical students in human anatomy. In: The world through the eyes of youth: Student readings: Proceedings of the VIII international student conference. Kursk: Kursk State Medical University; 2025. 285–7.