Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the preoperative volume of peritumoural oedema according to magnetic resonance imaging in patients with gliomas. A single-centre observational study was conducted, including 60 patients aged 21 to 75 years, with predominance of high-grade diffuse gliomas grade 4 according to the World Health Organisation classification. The volume of peritumoural oedema was determined using magnetic resonance imaging in T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences by means of volumetric analysis, followed by stratification into four groups. Neurological, cognitive, and functional status were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the modified Rankin Scale, with final evaluation performed at 6 months. It was found that the preoperative peritumoural oedema volume significantly correlated with the severity of functional deficiency 6 months after surgery (correlation coefficient r = 0.68; p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.81). It was shown that with a peritumoural oedema volume of 30 cm3 or more, the proportion of adverse outcomes on the modified Rankin Scale of more than 2 points was 60.0%, whereas with a peritumoural oedema volume of less than 30 cm³, this indicator did not exceed 26.7%. It was calculated that the presence of peritumoural oedema with a volume of 30 cm³ or more is associated with a 4.13-fold increase in the probability of an unfavourable functional outcome (odds ratio 4.13; 95% confidence interval 1.39-12.27; p < 0.01). It was found that after surgical resection, the average volume of peritumoural oedema decreased dynamically, but on the first day there was a temporary increase in oedema followed by regression by days 14-30. A provision has been developed that the quantitative assessment of peritumoural oedema according to preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can be used as an objective criterion for risk stratification and planning decongestant therapy in patients with gliomas
Keywords
peritumoural zone; neuroimaging; T2/FLAIR; magnetic resonance imaging; Rankin Scale; risk stratificationSuggested citation
References
- Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M, Le Rhun E, Tonn JC, Minniti G, et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:170–86. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z
- Wen PY, Weller M, Lee EQ, Alexander BM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Barthel FP, et al. Glioblastoma in adults: A society for neuro-oncology (SNO) and EANO consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(8):1073–113. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa106
- Ahn SS, Cha J. Pre- and post-treatment imaging of primary central nervous system tumors in the molecular era. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22(11):1858–74. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1450
- Rykkje AM, Larsen VA, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Nielsen MB, Carlsen JF, Hansen AE. Timing of early postoperative MRI following primary glioblastoma surgery: A retrospective study of contrast enhancements in 311 patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(4):795. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040795
- Wen PY, van den Bent M, Youssef G, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM, Weller M, et al. RANO 2.0: Update to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas in adults. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(33):5187–99. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01059
- Ellingson BM, Sanvito F, Cloughesy TF, Huang RY, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Pope WB, et al. A neuroradiologist’s guide to operationalizing the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria version 2.0 for gliomas in adults. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024;45(12):1846–56. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8396
- Albert NL, Galldiks N, Ellingson BM, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM, Cicone F, et al. PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): A report of the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(1):E29–41. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00525-9
- Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, et al. Consensus recommendations for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(9):1262–75. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141
- Martucci M, Russo R, Giordano C, Schiarelli C, D’Apolito G, Tuzza L, et al. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of treated glioblastoma: A pictorial essay. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(15):3790. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153790
- Henriksen OM, Álvarez-Torres MM, Figueiredo P, Hangel G, Keil VC, Nechifor RE, et al. High-grade glioma treatment response monitoring biomarkers: Advanced MRI techniques in clinical practice. Front Oncol. 2022;12:810263. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810263
- Booth TC, Williams M, Luis A, Cardoso J, Ashkan K, Shuaib H. Machine learning and glioma imaging biomarkers. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(1):20–32. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811425
- Fang Z, Shu T, Luo P, Shao Y, Lin L, Tu Z, et al. The peritumoral edema index and related mechanisms influence prognosis of glioblastoma patients. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1417208. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417208
- World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
- Gao M, Cheng J, Qiu A, Zhao D, Wang J, Liu J. MRI-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for prognosis prediction in glioma patients. Clin Radiol. 2024;79(11):E1383–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.005
- Würtemberger U, Rau A, Diebold M, Becker L, Hohenhaus M, Beck J, et al. Advanced diffusion MRI demonstrates altered peritumoral microstructure in glioblastoma compared with brain metastases. Clin Neuroradiol. 2024;34(3):703–11. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01416-0
- Tan R, Sui Y, Wang Y, Zhu X. MRI-based radiomics of tumor and peritumoral edema for preoperative prediction of glioma grade. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1401977. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1401977
- Fu FX, Cai QL, Li G, Wu XJ, Hong L, Chen WS. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model for distinguishing glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression. Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;111:168–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.05.003
- Librizzi G, Lombardi G, Bertoldo A, Manara R. Perioperative imaging predictors of tumor progression and pseudoprogression: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024;202:104445. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104445
- Lin J, Su CQ, Tang WT, Xia ZW, Lu SS, Hong XN. Radiomic features on multiparametric MRI for differentiating pseudoprogression from recurrence in high-grade gliomas. Acta Radiol. 2024;65(11). DOI: 10.1177/02841851241283781
- Blakstad H, Mendoza Mireles EE, Heggebø LC, Magelssen H, Sprauten M, Johannesen TB, et al. Incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after radiation therapy in glioblastoma patients: A cohort study. Neurooncol Pract. 2024;11(1):36–45. DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad063
- Castañeyra-Ruiz L, González-Marrero I, García-Abad LH, Gonzalez-Arnay E, Camacho M, Carmona-Calero EMM, et al. Aquaporin-4 in glioblastoma: A nexus of glymphatic dysfunction, edema, immune evasion and treatment resistance. Front Cell Neurosci. 2025;19:1685491. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2025.1685491