ISSN 1694-8882 / e-ISSN 1694-8890
Vol. 18, No. 2, 2026 / Pages 145-157

Failure of the oesophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cicatricial oesophageal strictures

Toktogaziev_bakyt@mail.ru

Received 26.01.2026
Revised 22.04.2026
Accepted 29.05.2026

Abstract

The relevance of the study is conditioned by the need to reduce the risk of oesophagogastric anastomosis failure and improve post-operative outcomes in patients with benign scar lesions of the oesophagus. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence of oesophagogastric anastomosis failure and hospital outcomes after minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic extirpation of the oesophagus in patients with benign scar lesions of the oesophagus. A retrospective analysis was carried out of the outcomes of surgical treatment in 102 patients who underwent minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophageal resection at a specialist surgical centre, with a cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis created using a 23.5 mm diameter circular stapler. In all cases, vena azygos was preserved. Enteral nutritional support via a jejunostomy was initiated on the second day of the post-operative period. The main analysed indicator was the frequency of anastomosis failure. Additionally, post-operative mortality, the course of the post-operative period, and the need for repeated interventions were evaluated. The failure of oesophagogastric anastomosis was detected in 6 (5.9%) patients. In all cases, the complication was local in nature and was successfully treated with conservative and endoscopic tactics without repeated surgical interventions. The total post-operative mortality was 1.9% (2 cases) and was not associated with anastomosis failure. In 96 (94.1%) patients, the post-operative period was uneventful. In the long-term period, there were no cases of repeated reconstructive surgeries for anastomotic strictures. The results obtained indicate a low incidence of anastomosis failure and an acceptable safety profile of the minimally invasive approach. The practical significance of the study is to confirm the effectiveness of standardised surgical techniques and early enteral support in the prevention of post-operative complications

Keywords

dysphagia; thoracoscopic interventions; oesophageal reconstruction; gastric graft; post-operative complications; nutritional support; circular stapler

Suggested citation

APA Style
Toktogaziev, B. (2026). Failure of the oesophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cicatricial oesophageal strictures. Eurasian Health Journal, 18(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2026-2-145
Copied!
Vancouver Style
Toktogaziev, B.. Failure of the oesophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cicatricial oesophageal strictures. Eurasian Health J. 2026;18(2):145-57. https://doi.org/10.54890/1694-8882-2026-2-145
Copied!

References

  1. Li H, Zhuang S, Yan H, Wei W, Su Q. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis. Front Surg. 2021;8:743266. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.743266
  2. Zhang A, Udelsman BV. Role and limits of minimally invasive esophagectomy for benign disease: A scoping review. Video Assist Thorac Surg. 2025;10:34. DOI: 10.21037/vats-24-34
  3. Artemkin EN, Sokolov AA, Tychinskaya KS, Kharitonova LS, Ryadinskaya IA, Sokolov DV. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for subtotal esophagogastric anastomotic leakage. Doctor.Ru. 2021;20(11):52–7. DOI: 10.31550/1727-2378-2021-20-11-52-57
  4. Tavares G, Tustumi F, Tristão LS, Bernardo WM. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak in esophagectomy and total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2021;34(5):doaa132. DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa132
  5. Riva CG, Siboni S, Sozzi M, Bonavina L. Stenting versus endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage after esophagogastric surgery. J Clin Med. 2025;14(19):7075. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14197075
  6. Ruchkin DV, Khamidov MM, Okonskaya DE, Kozlov VA, Kovalerova NB. Esophagectomy with simultaneous esophageal reconstruction for complex caustic esophageal strictures. Vestn Dagest Gos Med Akad. 2025;1(54):29–38.
  7. Joosten JJ, Slooter MD, van den Elzen RM, Bloemen PR, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, et al. Perfusion assessment by fluorescence time curves in esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction: A prospective clinical study. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(8):6343–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10107-9
  8. Famiglietti A, Lazar JF, Henderson H, Hamm M, Malouf S, Margolis M, et al. Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(3):1022–30. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.01.15
  9. El-Sourani N, Miftode S, Bockhorn M. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis at a tertiary university center. Surg Open Sci. 2022;11:69–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.12.003
  10. Jung DH, Huh CW, Min YW, Park JC. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for the management of upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations: A multicenter retrospective study of factors associated with treatment failure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(2):281–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.018
  11. Grimminger PP. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for esophagectomy: A paradigm shift in perioperative care. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024;31:8504–5. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16139-2
  12. Hayami M, Klevebro F, Tsekrekos A, Samola Winnberg J, Kamiya S, Rouvelas I, et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: A single-center’s early experience. Dis Esophagus. 2021;34(9):doaa122. DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa122
  13. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2024;333(1): 71–4. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972
  14. Toneev EA, Pikin OV, Aleksandrov OA. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following McKeown esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective analysis. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 2024;183(1):15–22. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2024-183-1-15-22
  15. Samakov AA, Akmatov TA, Sydigaliev KS, Toygonbaev AT, Mambetov AK, Bigishiev MM, et al. Results of surgical treatment of post-burn oesophageal cicatricial strictures. Vestn KGMA im I K Akhunbaeva. 2020;4:61–6. DOI: 10.54890/.v4i4.56
  16. Nizamkhodjaev ZM, Ligay RE, Khadjibayev JA, Abdullayev DS. Dynamics of quality of life in patients with combined post-burn scar strictures of the esophagus and stomach. Universum Med Pharmacol. 2024;3(108):15–23. DOI: 10.32743/UniMed.2024.108.3.17000
  17. Godzhello EA, Belisova TV, Bulganina NA, Khrustaleva MV. Planned supportive bougienage is the basis for complex endoscopic treatment of refractory cicatricial strictures of the esophagus and anastomoses. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2024;225(5):72–9. DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-225-5-72-79
  18. Godzhello EA, Belisova TV, Bulganina NA, Khrustaleva MV. Modification of the classification of benign cicatricial strictures of the esophagus and esophageal anastomoses and the scale for assessing the immediate results of endoscopic treatment. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2025;237(5):47–58. DOI: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-237-5-47-58
  19. Kovalenko AK, Mametdzhumaev RB, Dudarev AA, Stankeeva EV, Dudarev VA. Treatment of cicatricial oesophageal stenoses in children after chemical burns. Int Stud Sci Bull. 2023;6.
  20. Yang J, Das KK, Copland AP, Abdi M, Akshintala VS, Bhatt A, et al. Enteral stent placement for benign and malignant disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025;102(4):469–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.637
  21. Vohra I, Gopakumar H, Sharma NR, Puli SR. Efficacy of endoscopic vacuum therapy in esophageal luminal defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endosc. 2025;58(1):53–62. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.282